Evolution’s instinct

Introduction

This paper devoted to describe evolution theory which was proposed in [1]. Main points of the theory were stated by the author in the first part of paper [1] (Universal mechanism of development (UMD)) on the several pages. Such short description make the exposition of the UMD very metaphorical and hardly understandable by people who used to use scientific style of thinking where each notion firstly is introduced in details and further is used in derivative constructions.

The author of the paper which you now are reading describes main ideas of [1] using scientific style of writing to the extent which can be reached while making the deal with such abstractions as object, system and so on.

The author is fully agree with content and sequences from the theory developed in [1] excluding some non fundamental points which will be specially marked while paper goes.

On the question "what is new in this paper in comparison with [1] right answer is "new description of the theory from [1]".

The work is built in following manner. In part 1 there are main notions are defined which will be further used for theory construction. In part 2 the theory of evolution itself is described in details and system of equations of evolution theory from [1] is defined. Other parts are devoted to consideration of some important consequences from the evolution theory and placed into the paper mostly for better understanding and illustration of the material of part 2.

Before starting the description couple advices for better understanding of the material:

• If possible to maximally reject anthropocentric style of thinking about the universe. This theory has something common with "manhood" only because ‘man' is one of the parts of matter with concrete level of complexity and all consequences which follow from this fact;
• To reject commonplace notion of ‘time' which is "measured' using for comparison the measurement of processes of movement of Earth around Sun and Earth around its axis.

The final note before the start: for reading and understanding the content of this paper reader must not be familiar with paper [1] and/or any other source of information.

1. Main notions and definitions

In this part of work there are main notions are introduced which will further used in part 2 for definition of main equations of evolution theory.

1.1 Object

Notation which is used in equations of evolution: o – object.

Object is the primary notion which can not defined through other notions.

Main properties of object which are interested from evolution theory, described in the paper, point of view are:

• possibility to connect objects to each other independently from their levels of complexity difference;
• existence of internal volume (some internal space, structure);
• existence of boundary which separates internal volume of object from his external environment;
• possibility of transfer of internal volume of object to its external environment;
• possibility of transfer of external environment of object to its internal volume.

1.1.1 Internal volume and external environment

Internal volume and external environment of object are in state of dynamic balance on the boundary between them and are the main attributes of objects of arbitrary level of complexity. Without mutual transition of them to each other no movement of matter is possible including evolution.

1.1.2 Subjective and objective

Subjective and objective correlate with each other as internal and external and are derivatives from notions of internal and external. Objective represents itself through links of object with external environment and as sequence can be viewed by external observer. Subjective is collection of internal properties of object which can not be investigated and observed by external observer.

There is variant of uncertainty principle exists: the more deeper we try to come into internal volume (structure) of object (creating links of external environment to parts of object) the less knowledge we can derive about internal structure of object.

1.1.3 Material and ideal

Because of the internal volume (structure) of object is much "less" than external environment the transition of external environment to internal volume goes with accompaniment of process of idealization (abstraction). Into internal volume can be placed (represented) only small part of external environment others should be rejected (abstracted). So we can say that internal volume (structure) of object is more ideal than external environment but the both are material structures. All consists of matter of different level of ideality. Pure "spirit" and pure matter (without any spirit) don't exist.

1.2 Resources

Notation which is used in equations of evolution:

Resources ( R ) are what flows through links which connects different objects to each other. In paper [2] there is classification of main resources defined which divides all resources to 4 groups: matter (money), energy, knowledge (information) and process (time). Resources comprise strict hierarchy on the principle of reducibility of one resource to others. From low hierarchy resources higher hierarchy resources can not be derived (low resources can not be converted to higher resources) but higher resources can be converted (reduced) to low resources. From process we get knowledge, from knowledge we get energy and energy is convertible to matter.

Levels of resources can be prolonged to higher levels but for this paper given classification is enough and we use it only for supportive and illustrative purposes.

Object's lack of resources indicates that entropy (destruction) reached the critical boundary and triggers attempt of development.
Several words about transition of resources. 3 low resources (matter, energy and knowledge) we can transit by usual ways we used to but to ways to transit process (time) is not researched at all. For some understanding of the issue (transition of process (time) from one object to another) catalysis process can be considered. Catalyst raises frequency of the process but at the same time catalyst does not take part in the accelerated by him process (his matter stays the same after the catalysis done). It gives us some intuition about how process can be transferred from one object to another.

Hierarchy of any system reflects levels of resources capacity of the objects in the system. The higher resources capacity of object the more ideal the object is. This property is a direct sequence from resources hierarchy in which from more ideal resources less ideal ones can be derived but not in the opposite way.
At the end let's consider one more idea about how resources of different level correlate to each other: resource of higher level is the resource of low level which can not be separated from its material carrier.

For example, energy is matter which can not be separated from its (unique) carrier. Process (time) is the non separated from its (unique) carrier knowledge. Knowledge is non separated from its (unique) carries energy.

As have already been said resources of are not reducible to each other in direction\from low level to higher level. But objects which own different kind of resources can union and establish system from themselves where each resource finds its applicability. It makes sense because for converting from higher resources lower level resources some work should be done.

That can be viewed on the example of investments to the innovative ideas when innovator who owns knowledge and process unions with investor (money (matter)) and businessman (energy). In this case the owner of higher resources actually leads those who own lower resources because he defines the direction of development (evolution's instinct). Other participants conduct administrative activity (instinct of self-preservation) and sales and marketing activities (reproductive instinct).

1.2.1. Models for dealing with resources from points of view of instincts of self-preservation, reproduction and evolution

At this point we can interrupt inexhaustible theme about resources because we have enough information necessary to continue our story.

1.3 Process (time, 1-st instinct, self-preservation)

Notation which is used in equations of evolution:

The essence of notion of time is process. All processes are derivatives from main (initial) process – extraction of internal volume from external environment and opposite (mutual transition of internal and external). The links (space) connect different objects to each other but process (time) is unique for each object (each object must have unique properties for existence). That means that process is initial instrument of existence, till the first process' appearance nothing could exist. So process is single for each object but space (links) is multiple.

Two objects can be in the same place at the same time only in case of their full mutual identity. If two objects have the same process and the same set of links to their external environment we can differ them from each other.

When process stops then existence stops and we can imagine everything including the situation where all objects can be in the same place at the same "time" (or better in "without time").

Main property of process is his "cycle frequency" (cycle, frequency, tempo, rate, speed, time, pace, jerk, rate of rise, etc). Further we will not differ the notion of "process" and his main property (cycle frequency) using the same symbol (T) for both notions and using postfixes o and s when we need to differ process of system from process of object.

Process is an abstraction of instinct of self-preservation because to self-preserve means to preserve own process (own time). We use number 1 for this instinct because it is most basis instinct.

1.3.1 Movement in process (time)

To move in process (time) means to be the part of some process, to be dissolved into this process.

1.4 Connectivity (space, 2-nd instinct, reproductive instinct)

Notation which is used in equations of evolution:

Link is a way through which resources flow from object to object. Objects can be the same level of complexity and different levels of complexity. Each object has its own process (time) but they can be connected by common space between them (links which connect the objects).

Links can be divided into two main classes: system links (functional) and non system links. Each developing object has a tendency to minimize number of non system links and globalize system links.

Connectivity (space) is abstraction of reproductive instinct, whose realization leads to the situation where object creates more and more links with external environment, tries to reproduce his internal volume in external environment.

1.4.1 Movement in connectivity (space)

To move in connectivity (space) means to change configuration of object's links with external environment (break old and create new links).

1.5 System

Notation which is used in equations of evolution:

System is means for existence of objects which are a parts of the system. Without system objects of the system can not exist and can die or try to develop themselves to the system level of complexity and replace system by itself, internalize (include into its internal volume) the system and its main properties (which made her the means or existence for its objects).

Existence of system is the necessary condition for development. Without system object can in best case self-preserve or degrade (which is a rule).

System and object are recursive notions for each other. On its level of complexity system is an object of the more global and complex system. Similar, object consists of other objects or which it plays a role of system – means for existence.

System and objects for which it is the means of existence connected to each other by one-to-one relation. Structure and functions of system define structure and functions of objects for which it is means of existence and vice versa.

For proceeding of process of evolution the key notion is notion of anti-entropy.

1.5.1 Anti-entropy (Nent)

Anti-entropy is maximally possible quantity of resources and links (inside system) which average system's object can has, this is possibilities of system.

1.6 Matter

Matter consists of objects, links between objects (space), processes in which objects and links take part and resources which flow through links while processes go.

Connectivity (space) have tendency to slow down processes (time) till the full interrupt, none being.

Matter consists of objects of different levels of complexity. Level of complexity are separated from each other by their processes (cycle frequency) and connected to each other by common links (space).

1.6.1 System which is the means of existence for matter

Because each material objects has system which is means for its existence then there must exist system which is the means of existence for matter.

Such primary system, system of lowest level of complexity is the system which consist of process (time) and links (space). Matter really consists of processes (time) and links (space) which transforms to each other.

1.7 Globality

Notation which is used in equations of evolution:

Gl = Rl	Globality of link,
Go = Ro	Globality of object.

Globality of link (object) is quantity of resources which can potentially flow through the link (object) for one cycle of process of link (object).

Because connectivity (space) has a tendency to low cycle frequency of processes there exists tendency to low number of links and at the same time to raise globality of links.

Ideal link is the link that realize all four main resources (matter, energy, knowledge and process).

Because of this highly organized objects usually have rather small number of links but the links are multi functional. Links require resources for their support so the less number of links and the more functional links (realize several resources) the more additional resources are freed which can be used to get resources of higher order of complexity.

1.8 Level of complexity

Notation which is used in equations of evolution:

The more quantity of resources the object has (can potentially flow through the object) and higher cycle frequency of process of the object the higher complexity of the object.

1.9 Objective power (forces)

In paper [1] well noted that in Universe there are only two objective powers – inertia and entropy. All other objective powers (gravitation, electromagnetic force, etc) are derivatives from the two.

In contrast to inertia and entropy force (power) of development is the subjective force and its behavior can not be observed by external observer (from outside of object who is developing).

1.9.1 Inertia

Inertia is the first objective force which has a tendency to preserve everything. For evolution instinct this force plays multiple roles. From one side inertia resists to any changes including development of object but from other side if system is being destroyed by entropy it is the inertia, basis of self-preservation instinct, will tend to save the system into internal volume (structure) of developing objects.

Inertia – is the essence of instinct of self-preservation.

1.9.2 Entropy

The second objective force entropy has a tendency to destroy everything. Entropy behaves itself as if it is searching the parts of matter which can develop themselves. Entropy constantly raises needs of objects in resources and at the end leads the lack of resources and as a sequence in lucky circumstances can initiate process of object development to the system level.

As a rule objects' development fails and system goes to dead and falls to pieces and the system's objects go to systems of low level complexity or die.

Entropy is the essence of reproductive instinct in the same manner as inertia is the essence of instinct of self-preservation.

In more details we will consider the reproductive instinct below in corresponding chapter devoted to correlations of entropy and anti-entropy.

Let's give definition of entropy through notions of links and resources.

Entropy is minimally necessary quantity of resources and links (inside of system) required for stable existence of average system's object. This is the need (requirements) of system which being not satisfied lead to damage of the system.

1.10 Conclusions

In chapter 1 main notions and definitions were introduced which will be used further for construction evolution theory's system of equations. For deeper investigation of such fundamental notions as connectivity (space), process (time), system and resources the reader can pay attention to scientific sources.

For example, connectivity is being researched in graph theory, processes and resources in chemistry, system is the main notion of quantum mechanics (couple of analogies from quantum mechanics will be given below in description of processes of subjective interiorization and objective realization).

2. Evolution (3-rd instinct, development)

In this, second chapter, there will be constructed the system of equations of evolution and main mechanism of evolution will be considered in details. These mechanisms have been initially introduced in paper [1] as a Universal mechanism of development (UMD).

2.1 The goal of evolution (1-st rule of Universal mechanism of development)

The first rule of UMD states that if evolution (transition of matter to the next level of complexity) happens then the goal of this process is always the same – self-preservation of system which is the means of existence of the objects from which the system consists of.

Instinct of self-preservation saves the object itself, reproductive instinct saves the population of objects but third (evolution) instinct saves the system – means of existence of its objects.

All three instincts are realized through inertia, self-preservation.

Inertia if triggered by entropy which constantly increases needs of objects in links and resources and earlier or later leads to situation when objects can receive sufficient quantity of resources for their stable existence in the system. So in this case entropy (needs of object) reaches the level of anti-entropy (possibilities of system).

There is another scenario is possible: as a result of some external catastrophic influence system's level of anti-entropy goes down dramatically which is reflected in lack of resources and triggers the development process.

We now are ready to strictly formulate the first rule of UMD.

First rule of UMD: If the system is the means of existence for objects it consists of then in situation when system is being destroyed (links between the objects and system are being broken and objects suffer from lack of resources) some of the system's objects tend to raise their level of complexity to the level of the whole system.

Object (or group of objects) tries to substitute the whole system by themselves and comprise the new system from themselves. This is an interiorization (recreation (reconstruction) by object (objects) inside himself (themselves) and from himself (themselves) the external environment) which is the main mechanism of development.

While the process of interiorization proceeds object (group of objects) raise globality of their links and cycle frequency of their process (time) to the process of the whole system. This is expressed below as a equation of evolution number (1). Maximal grobality of object is reached at the moment when object has already interiorized the whole system process and raised to the system level of complexity. Further next stage of development (or degradation) starts, the singularity point is reached.

2.2 Preconditions of evolution

Now we are ready to list main preconditions of evolution's instinct.

For development process being started the next things must be in place:

1. System which is means of existence of its objects. Without system objects can not develop. This is the main precondition which gives the goal for the evolution process.
2. Influence of entropy. Entropy level must be optimal: too strong entropy leads the system's objects to dead. So lack of resources must be in place but it must be compatible with objects' existence.
3. Object which has internal volume (structure) complex enough to have the possibility for development. If in internal volume there is no space to include system's main functional links then process of interiorization is not possible in principle.

2.3 Ways of evolution (external reunion and internal recreation)

There are two different ways for development (evolution) of matter: horizontal and vertical.

In horizontal way separate objects can reunion with each other and fill the space by themselves. This is a surface way which has been dominated in Earth till the appearance of life and further the intellect.

The second way is connected with including the system into internal volume of object but not the whole system, only its ideal image (model). This way became possible after appearance of live and intelligent matter which has sufficient internal volume (nervous system of high animals and humans) for success interiorizaton of external system.

2.4 Stages of evolution (autonomization, interiorization and implementation)

In ideal form cycle of evolution movement of matter looks like following:

1. Process (time) (instinct of self preservation, 1-st instinct)
2. Evolution, development to the system level of complexity (3-rd instincts, instinct of self-preservation of system, evolution's instinct).
3. Connectivity (space). Spreading the reached level of complexity to the external environment, reproduction instinct, 2-nd instinct.

But this is really ideal schema which in practice unfolds in five stages (to three previously listed stages (1, 3, 5) two transition stages are added (2,4)):

1. Existence of objects in the system's process (time). Objects are self-preserving get all necessary resources from the system. At this stage anti-entropy of the system is higher that its entropy, possibilities are higher than needs, this is area of stability. At some point level of entropy reaches the level of anti-entropy and trigger of lack of resources necessary for existence of objects in system is turned on. The second stage of evolution process starts.
2. Some objects begin reflecting themselves from the system go from system process (time) start to become autonomic from the system. The third stage of evolution process, attempt to raise level of complexity to the whole system level starts.
3. Evolution. Subjective interiorization, tendency to higher complexity, development.
4. Going away from development to connectivity (space). Idealization, construction of new model of system, which will be reproduced into external world starts.
5. Connectivity (space). Reproduction of new level of complexity to the external environment, objective implementation of reached level of development.

For better understanding of the evolution cycle's stages let's remember about the types of abstraction because interiotization process without process of abstraction could not be possible. Object interiorizes not the whole system but only its essence, abstraction of the system, only functional links, etc.

So we have three types of abstraction:

1. Isolating abstraction which isolates researched phenomenon from some integrity, this is autonomization, second stage of evolution cycle.
2. Generalized abstraction which gives some picture of the phenomenon, interiorizes the phenomenon, get to know the essence of the phenomenon or system, key stage of development, third stage of evolution cycle.
3. Idealization which substitutes real empirical phenomenon (system) with idealized schema (model) which will be further implemented (reproduced) into the external environment, forth stage of evolution cycle.

Now having the understanding of what abstraction is let's consider in more details stages of evolution cycle from the second till the fifth.

2.4.1 Autonomization (recoherence)

When entropy through trigger of lack of resources starts the process of object's development to the system level first what developing object does is to separate himself from the system, to reflect the system and stay apart from it. This process is accompanied with breaking real links between object and system and leads to destruction of the system. The destruction can lead the system to deaf or can not if the system can exist without developing object.

This process corresponds to notion of isolated abstraction which isolates the considered phenomenon from some integrity. This is reflection of the part from the single.

In quantum physics there is some analogy with this process exists which is called recoherence process. When there is no external observer the system occurs in so called pure tangled state, in the subjective world of waves of potentiality all parts of system become none recognizable from each other.

What is going on further we can not observe from outside and can only do some suppositons.

2.4.2 Interiorization (waves of possibility)

Se we are now in fully closed system in the world of waves of possibility.
Interiorization process runs through two stages:

1. Having reflected himself from the system object can apply to it generalized abstraction which gives the whole picture of the system, interiorizes the system, gets know the essence of the system. This is the key stage of development, third stage of evolution cycle.
2. After generalized abstraction of the system is done developing object starts the process of system idealization which leads to substitution of real system with idealized model which further will be implemented (reproduced) into external environment, forth stage of evolution cycle. Without idealization further development is not possible because it is necessary preparation stage for the fifth stage of evolution cycle – objective implementation of reached level of complexity to the external world.

Equations (2) and (3) reflects the fact that when processes of autonomization and further interiorization of the system run speed of change of globality of the object is in inverse proportion to the speed of change of number of external links of the object (3) and speed of change of process (time) of the object is inverse proportion to the speed of change of process (time) of the system:

2.4.3 Implementation (decoherence)

And finally it's time for the last stage of evolution cycle, implementation, objective exteriorization of the reached level of complexity into external world, stage of creating new system of more global links with the external environment. Without this stage fulfilled successfully the development process will slow down because in automization and interiorization processes object breaks links with real system and gets in unstable state. If implementation, reproduction will fail the object can be fully destroyed because it could not substitute previous functional links with new links and as a results it does't get necessary resources for existence.

Implementation process, reproduction, growth of connectivity of object with external environment in the extreme case leads to the object's destruction or its lowering to the previous level of complexity because connectivity (space) destructs process (time) but process (time) is the essence of existence of reproducing object. Below we will consider this process in more details.

2.4.4 Five stages of development

Суммируя все вышесказанное про этапы эволюции, получаем 5 этапов, 3 основных (1,3, 5) и 2 промежуточных (2, 4).

1. Existence in process (time) of the system.
2. Running away from system's process, starting point of development process, autonomizaton.
3. Evolution, subjective interiorization, rise of complexity, development.
4. Running away from development process to the connectivity (space), idealization, construction of model which will further reproduced into external environment.
5. Connectivity (space), objective implementation of reached level of complexity.

Below in chapter 3 these stages will be graphically illustrated as a function in system of coordinates connectivity (L), level of complexity (∑) and process (T).

2.5 Where is Darvin? (Evolution self-preservation and reproduction)

Evolution theory developed in [1] and presented here in details does not contradict Darvin's theory of evolution but pose strong boundaries on area of applicability of the Darvin's theory of evolution restricting its applicability only on stable periods of system's existence. When system is being destroyed the third, evolution instinct starts to work which could raise the matter to the new higher level of complexity. In stable situations there can be only insignificant fluctuations caused by intraspecific competition, interspecific competition, gene mutation and mechanism of natural selection.

Evolution in Darvin's style leads to higher stability of the system and requires sacrificing part for the whole. As a result objects are being averaged and fit for system's needs.

Development in style of evolution's instinct starts when system is being damaged and requires sacrificing the whole for its best part (developing objects).

2.6 Reproductivity is the failed development (Second rule of UMD)

Here we consider in details the second ruse of UMD.

When objects have gone through first four stages of development but did not manage to construct new system of links to external environment then new system is being fully destroyed and as a result we have set of objects identical to those which were before the development process started. So we have reproductive process which can be considered as failed development.

Second rule of UMD: Reproduction is failed development/

The second rule of UMD says that reproduction is not possible in principle without objects' attempt to become something better and higher without tendency to reach higher goal. If goal, system don't exist no reproduction is possible in principal.

2.6.1 Entropy (Ent) and anti-entropy (Nent)

In [1] there is following definition of entropy and anti-entropy is given.

"Maximally possible number of links of average system's object – possibility of system, level of its anti-entropy.

Minimally necessary for stable existence of average object of system number of links – needs of system, level of its entropy below which system can not turn out without being destroyed».

To resolve this contradiction we should connect notions of entropy and anti-entropy not only with notion of link but also with notion of resource.

Let's use key observation which unions notions of link and resource: links are required for flowing (exchanging) resources through them.

Now we are ready to write out definitions of entropy and anti-entropy in more strict and exact mode:

Anti-entropy (Nent) is maximally possible quantity of resources and links (inside the system) which available for average object of the system, this is possibilities of the system.

Entropy (Ent) is the minimally necessary for stable existing of average object of system quantity of resources and links, these are needs of the system, below which it can not turn out without being destroyed.

Now everything is on its proper place. Entropy (needs) are constantly growing. Growth of entropy is the growth of number of links and quantity of resources of the object.

When entropy reaches the level of anti-entropy system can not provide object with additional resources and functional links, development potential of object in the system is exhausted.

But at the same time entropy continue growth in correspondence to one of the most fundamental nature's low which man ever discovered. At this point of bifurcation two fully inverse to each other scenario can be implemented: development (evolution) and degradation.

Evolution is connected with raising the quantity of resources through globalization of links of objects that is with growth of level of complexity of object (matter).

Evolution is the running away the system (autonomization, interiorization, idealization of the system by developing object) and creation of new system (implementation of new level of complexity of object) through creating links to objects with higher level of complexity and as a result with a possibility to get more resources.

Degradation is connected with attempts to raise quantity of resources through increasing number of links inside of the system. But the limit of the system' possibilities is reached and the inverse process is triggered. The more new links inside the system the object creates the less resources he gets it the results and at extreme point he turns out in the previous level of complexity, etc.

It can be said that at that moment for the sake of increasing of number of non functional links the functional links start to degrade because cycle frequency of object's process decreases (see below equation (4)).

On the fig. 1 the process of object's development to the system level and degradation after reaching this level is reflected in graphical form.

All which have been said here about degradation can be considered as an illustration to second rule of UMD (reproduction (growth of links of object to external environment, more object in the world) is failed development (more world in the object, interiorization).

2.6.2 Process (time) and connectivity (space)

From the arguments of previous chapter 2.6.1 the equation (4) can be derived as immediate consequence:

The direct sense of the equation (4) is that in case of uncontrolled growth of connectivity (space) of object his process (time) goes down, cycle frequency tends to zero that is to not being.

In contrast removing non functional, useless links (space) in the interiorization process object can raise cycle frequency of its process (time) or support its constant level.

2.6.3 Successful and ultra-successful development

What is non successful development we have considered in previous part – it is reproduction which leads in extreme case to self-preservation.

Successful development also is rather understandable this is successful reproduction the reached level of complexity with the possibility for further development on the basis of interiorization of more global system of links.

What is ultra-successful development?

In case of ultra-successful development object has included (interiorized) in itself all available for him environment, interiorized the system in to the extreme extent in full volume and that was the most global system which was available for the object for interiorization.

At this point process (time) of object is the same as process of system of maximal level of complexity and it should be noted that internal volume of object is orders of magnitude less then interiorized system.

As a result huge internal pressure inside the object has been reached. Boundary of the internal volume of the object and external environment does not burden this pressure and "Big Bang" happens. As a result of the "Big Bang" huge amount of the energy is being emitted into the external world (the more complex the structure the more energy can be emitted as a result of the structure destroyment).

As a result of emitting such huge quantity of the energy new cluster of matter can appear which is fully independent of external environment which was before the explosion and which the object has interiorized. This can lead to creation of new Universe from the matter of the destructed object.

2.7 Auto-development (auto-evolution) accelerates in process (time) and globalizes in connectivity (space) (third rule of UMD)

The higher (more idea) resources which the system owns the faster can be the process of exchanging these resources and the faster resources can be exchanged the faster entropy grows and reaches level of anti-entropy and the next cycle of development is started which leads to globality of links increase.

That is development (evolution) transforms to self-development which does not need external impact to proceed. Equations (5) and (6) reflect the third rule of UMD.

Third rule of UMD: Auto-development accelerates in process and globalixes in connectivity.

2.8 System of equations of development (evolution) process

2.9 Conclusions

In chapter 2 we have deduced system of equations of development (evolution) process which describe in details the evolution theory introduced in [1].

In the next chapters we will shortly consider several most important consequences from the system of equations of development process which also are present in [1].

3. Evolution's cycle of matter's movement in system of coordinates of process of system (T_s ), connectivity (L) and level of complexity (∑)

Let's differentiate the expression which defines notion of level of complexity (∑ = G_oT_o) using the rule of differentiation of multiplication of two functions. After that let's substitute differentials of globality (G^'_o) and process (T^'_o) with their expressions from equations (2) and (3) from equation system of development process and get the equation (7) which represents the rate of change of level of complexity through rates of change of process of system and connectivity:

In reality numerator is some expression which we for the sake of simplicity denoted with a symbol Const. For our further consideration this is enough.

The essence of the equation (7) is that when matter stops movements in process (time) and in connectivity (space) rate of change of complexity level become infinite.

Below on fig. 2 there is a picture of ideal evolution cycle which proceeds in three stages (self-preservation, development, reproduction) drawn in system of coordinates ∑, T_s и L.

In reality the picture looks like on fig. 3 and the whole evolution cycle is exposed into five stages as it is shown on fig.4.

On the fig. 4 there is detailed picture of all five stages of development cycle of matter:

1. Existence in process of system (time).
2. Going away from process of system and starting point of evolution (autonomization).
3. Evolution (interiorization, raising level of complexity, development). This point is denoted by α in the fig.4 and is the point of inflection (critical point). It is the highest point of development after it reproduction process starts. At this point rate of change of complexity level can become infinite and with small part of process of system object can dramatically raise its level of complexity.
4. Starting point of going away from development process into connectivity (space), idealization, model of system construction which will be reproduced in the world.
5. Connectivity (space). Objective implementation of reached level of complexity.

4. Evolution process is accompanied with increasing of level of complexity and decreasing of volume of developing matter

Evolution (development) requires sacrificing the whole for its best part.

Stability requires sacrificing the part for saving the whole.

Let's substitute variables of globality and process with their expressions from equations (1) and (4) from system of equations of development process and put them into definition of level of complexity (∑ = G_oT_o):

We deduced the equation (8):

From the equation (8) we can see that level of complexity of matter ( ) and connectivity ( ) of matter are connected with inverse proportion dependency. This property can be treat in the way that the more complex matter become the less matter reach that level of complexity.

In reality this proportion is catastrophically not in fame of developed matter. As a rule volume of developed matter several orders of magnitude less than the volume of matter which stays on the previous level of complexity.

5. What is the difference between evolution and revolution?

Revolution as it is showed in [1], chapter "Turbulence" is the process of substitution of one objects to another in the stage of objective implementation, stage of reproduction and this process leads to degradation (reproduction goes in the extreme case to dissolving in external environment in self-preservation process.

In contrast to revolution evolution is the development process, substitution of the whole by its best small part which has successfully developed and reached next level of complexity.

6. One more time about "time"

Our natural a priory given understanding of time is the direct consequence of dominating in us two first instincts – self-preservation and reproduction.

Operating and understanding of ‘time' at the level of processes of cycling Earth around Sun and cycling the Earth around its axis is the main mistake of mind. From this mistake crazy thoughts about "movements in time to the past and to the future" and other speculations of the similar character are originated from primitive tribes have been conducted such "movements" for dozens of thousands of years. They "invented" the concept of "cyclic time" and "dream time" and other similar concepts which reflect their full dissolving into natural processes in common and processes of non live matter in particular.

Understanding of "time" as a process poses everything to its proper place. Now the notion of movement in time in future and in the past become having clear sense. For example, interiorization process is movement in the future to the new level of complexity. In contrast process of implementation is the movement in the past to the previous level of organization.

That is notion of "time" without process, targeting doesn't have practical sense. Moreover quantum physics have deeply looked into most low, fundamental levels of matter and have not discovered there any ‘time' to which we are adapted in everyday life and which we illusory perceive from our dissolving into two first instincts which makes matter the slave of the system. Instead of this physics have found in micro world such notions as system, observer (object), non local links and wave processes (processes with some cycle frequency).

7. Fractal structure of matter

As scientists discovered matter has fractal structure, its parts repeat the whole in common features but not in the exact manner just similar one.

Theory of evolution which has been described here clearly shows the reasons of this property of matter and proves that it would not be in other way at all.

Одним из важнейших этапов движения материи является интериоризация, когда развивающийся объект (объекты) интериоризируют (абстрагируют) уже существующую систему, представляют ее функции в идеальном виде. Но идеализируется то, что уже было, т.е. в результате неизбежно подобие новой системы со старой, так как новая система суть есть старая, представленная в другом ракурсе, и так на в каждом эволюционном цикле. Вот почему мы видим постоянное подобие на всех уровнях сложности материи.

One of the most important stages of matter' movement is the process of interiorization when developing object (objects) interiorize (reflect, abstract) already existing system represent its functions in more ideal form. But what is idealizing is the same besides of level of idealization. Because of this it is inevitably that new system is similar in common features to the old system. The new system is the old system represented from another point of view and this happens in all evolution cycles. This is the reason that we see all the same in different levels of complexity of matter – the fractal structure of the matter.

The prototype is the same so the result also is the predetermined in common features.

8. "Old" and "New"

Several words about notions "old" and "new" in the light of the theory of evolution's instinct.

As it was shown in previous chapter 7 we can interiorize only those which already exist. So we as if return to "old" and in case of successful development get new ideal model of system (new level of complexity) that is create "new". So returning to ‘old' we create ‘new'.

Further we start to implement new level of complexity into external environment that is create new systems based on new level of complexity. But at the extreme case the implementation process leads us to the state where reproducing matter dissolves in the process of system of previous level of complexity from which process of development has started. That means that creating ‘new' we return to ‘old'.

This paradox is successfully resolved in spherical model of time where process (time) is the process of mutual transition of internal into external and vise versa. Process of transition of external into internal (interiorization) is the movement in the future (new level of complexity) and process of transition of internal into external (implementation, reproduction) is the process of movement to the past (previous level of complexity).

Returning to ‘old' we create ‘new' and creating the ‘new' we return to the ‘old'.

9. Ethics of evolution's instinct

Ethics of evolution's instinct poses as a highest value the matter which is in developing process the matter which has not implemented yet its potential into external environment. That is the cornerstone of evolution ethics is the process of going to the next level of complexity (interiorization) in contrast with self-preservation and reproduction of existing level of complexity of matter.

From this point of view abortion is more terrible crime than killing the already born person. The main reason for such treatment is that living 1 second and living 70 years have only quantitative difference but the difference between living 1 second and not living at all have qualitative difference. Abortion deprives the creature being not only life. Something basic, primary which is the cause for life and for each life is only consequence.

Reproduction is only the consequence of attempt of development. This attempt bares fundamental character, without this attempt no reproduction is possible at all (second rule of UMD).

10. Conclusions

In this paper the attempt to describe main ideas of theory of evolution initially introduced in [1] has been done.

Author recommend to get deeper known the paper [1] where reader will find many interesting examples of interiorization, implementation and many interesting consequences from the evolution theory.

The evolution theory presented here is applicable to matter of arbitrary level of complexity and to any area of activity: politics, economics, science, management, engineering, etc.

Но самый интересный объект для применения – это конечно разумная материя, носителем которой на планете Земля является человек. К тому же, как говорится, приглашаются все, ибо сказано – «Много званных...».

But the most interesting object for application is the intelligent matter carrier of which on Earth is the man. As already was noted everybody is invited to the development process for long ago was said – "There are many invited (called)...".

Literature

1. http://instinct3.narod.ru/index1.html
2. Балацкий Е.В. Теория жизненных ресурсов: модели и эмпирические оценки// «Мониторинг общественного мнения», №2, 2007.